Current need of prime minister

Hi,
A prime minister is considered as the face of the nation in our country. Technically , he is head of govt and all real powers of constitution are vested in him making him most powerful authority in India but morally, he also have the onus on him to maintain and to flourish the dignity and glory of the nation.
    But..........but......but.....what is our current PM (a sardar but not in real sense)  doing??
The one singal statement ,made by paki counterpart, calling him a rural woman ,complaining Uncle Sam, answers my above question....
The recent controversy, by rahul gandhi, also raises serious question about the dignity of prime minister. The remarks made by rahul gandhi on the criminal saving ordinance may work as image cleaner for party vice president (as believed by congress, that's why he made such a remark ..ha ha ha.) , but the language he used was not appropriate.(Come on mr. Gandhi , you are rubbishing a PM's decision). Further developments in this controversy clearly indicates the boomrang working of his comments.
  One more inference can be taken here that unintensionly rahul has also given some benifit to Mr. Modi as Modi ,the leader of opposition proved to be a saviour of PM in his Delhi rally.  The recent interview by PM again endorses his moderate image as he again defended HIS boss by reminiding us the principle of democracy that everyone has right to express his/her opinions, thus ,downplayed the RAHUL controversy.
     All the above discussion is evident to one thing  that we immediatly need a PM because morally, we do not one currently.  A PM WHO DOES NOT HAVE ANY OTHER BOSS ,WHO CAN NOT BE UNDERMINED AND WHO IS THE LEADER OF THE NATION ,NOT THAT OF A POLITICAL PARTY.
Do you agree?.....
Thank you...
...

Federal structure: positives and negetives

Hi,
This post , I am writing about federal structure in Govt administration in India. As the constitution guarentees federalism ,but it also puts a condition .."union of states".
The defination of federalism, thus varies from country to country , as it's different in US which also provides freedom for secession of states.
              Wer have to focus on both the  aspects ,concerned with federlism. In India, it was designed to keep the powers of states intact , with centre given residuary powers . It is well understood from this that the makers of constitution pushed for both the aspects. They wanted neither centre to subdue the powers of states nor states to behave as dictators in policy making. A clause was also inserted in constitution that while the time of shaping anynew law, which damages or subdue or interfere in the powers of state,center must act on the basis of opinions ,provided by states or state concerned.